Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve dark theme surface colour blending #1595

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 18, 2024
Merged

Conversation

hjiangsu
Copy link
Member

Pull Request Description

This PR adjusts some of the surface colours for the dark theme to better match the previous versions (v0.5.1). For some context, the flex_color_scheme update changed some of the surface colours to be darker. This change aims to match the colours more closely (although it won't be identical due to all the changes from Flutter's side)

Note: I'm not quite sure if the light mode was affected in any way, so no changes were applied there. Additionally, I'm not entirely sure how enabling Material You changes the look of the surface colours so I applied a bit of primary colour blending.

Issue Being Fixed

Issue Number: N/A

Screenshots / Recordings

v0.5.1 This PR
Dark Theme Screenshot_1731889145 Screenshot_1731889287
Material You Screenshot_1731889169 Screenshot_1731889827

Checklist

  • If a new package was added, did you ensure it uses an appropriate license and is actively maintained?
  • Did you use localized strings (and added appropriate descriptions) where applicable?
  • Did you add semanticLabels where applicable for accessibility?

Copy link
Member

@micahmo micahmo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@hjiangsu hjiangsu merged commit 7d4a5f7 into develop Nov 18, 2024
1 check passed
@hjiangsu hjiangsu deleted the fix/dark-theme-surface branch November 18, 2024 15:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants